In the first of these readings, I talked to you about how action brings hope, and how hope is precisely the thing we need to solve the problems of today.
In the second, I talked to you about the ingredients of hope – how silence, vulnerability and community come together to create this ecology of hope, this web of human interconnectedness, these chains of communal, hopeful, deliberate action, that allow change to ripple outwards, to make a better world.
This idea of hope is built upon the romantic notion that you mean something more than you suspect you do: that it is possible that your voice, out of the 7.8 billion voices clamouring on earth, can not only be clearly and distinctly heard, but also that you have something of value to say.
In fact, you can go further: the idea of hope is more than romantic: you could say that hope is quixotic, almost entirely unrealistic, positively naive.
But then, that’s the beauty of hope, one of its defining features: that hope is not just about the taking of action; hope is about the taking of action even though you know that your action may fail.
The failure of our actions is not the point; the action is the point, the belief in the rightness of the action, and the belief that that rightness will prevail.